The Innovation Ambition Matrix as a Strategy Weapon
Innovation is no longer a moonshot game. It’s not about isolated genius in an R&D lab or the occasional flashy product launch. It’s about systematically fueling growth, resilience, and market shaping through a disciplined mix of Innovation bets — mapped, measured, and managed. That’s where the Innovation-Ambition Matrix earns its stripes.
Originally introduced by Bansi Nagji and Geoff Tuff in HBR, the Innovation-Ambition Matrix offers a strategy-first framework for allocating Innovation efforts across three categories — Core, Adjacent, and Transformational. The matrix defines two critical axes: “Where to Play” (market focus) and “How to Win” (product or asset development). Plotting these variables reveals a strategic landscape for investing in the now, the near, and the next.
Let’s take a real-world spin through the lens of today’s Artificial Intelligence (AI) gold rush. OpenAI, Microsoft, and Google are making simultaneous moves across all three zones of ambition. Core Innovations — embedding generative AI into search engines and office suites. Adjacent Innovations — launching cloud-based AI APIs and tools for new customer segments. Transformational Innovations — reimagining what it means to work, create, or even think in a post-human-assistive future. No part of their Innovation Ambition exists in isolation. It is a coordinated portfolio warfare.
Anatomy of the Innovation-Ambition Framework
As defined by Nagji and Tuff, Innovation Ambition can be split into three buckets:
1. Core Innovations — Tuning existing products for existing markets.
2. Adjacent Innovations — Reaching new markets with extensions of current capabilities.
3. Transformational Innovations — Creating entirely new markets or redefining how value is delivered.
It’s a playbook for portfolio balancing that avoids the pitfalls of tunnel vision or moonshot mania.
Why Strategy Is Hard
Organizations don’t fail at Innovation because they lack ideas. They fail because they mis-allocate attention, capital, and talent. Strategy demands making painful trade-offs. Executives tend to overfund Core because it’s predictable and measurable. They underfund Transformational because it’s risky, messy, and takes time. But that trade-off is a trap. Betting too heavily on Core is like milking a cow that’s already stopped producing.
The Innovation-Ambition Matrix forces leaders to confront this imbalance. It puts structure around ambiguity and data around gut instinct. It asks Leadership teams to back up their “Innovation agenda” with a mapped set of initiatives and a funding allocation that mirrors ambition.
Used properly, this framework builds resilience into the strategy. External shocks — pandemics, tech shifts, regulatory upheaval — don’t just damage organizations. They expose the fragility of Core-only Innovation strategies.
Let’s zoom in to the first 2 key elements of the model, for now.
Core Innovations
These are your bread-and-butter. Low risk, high visibility, fast ROI. Core Innovations are about tuning the engine, not redesigning the car. Think: efficiency gains, process tweaks, minor feature enhancements. Apple does this religiously with every iPhone cycle. It’s not groundbreaking, but it’s crucial. It keeps revenue flowing, customers sticky, and your P&L predictable.
But Core alone doesn’t future-proof the business. It simply preserves the present. Too much focus here breeds operational complacency.
Adjacent Innovations
This is where things get interesting. Adjacent moves are about taking what you already do and finding new places or people to serve. New geographies. New customer segments. New use cases. Nike expanding from shoes to wearables wasn’t a brand leap — it was an adjacency built on the same muscle: performance.
Adjacent Innovations have a moderate risk-reward profile. They demand agility, but they let you ride the credibility of your brand or capabilities into new territory without a full reset.
Netflix: A Portfolio Case Study
Netflix may be the poster child for mastering Innovation Ambition. Early on, its Core was DVD-by-mail. Adjacent move? Streaming existing content. Transformational leap? Creating original content like “House of Cards.” But it didn’t stop there. The real Transformational play is happening now — AI-generated scripts, personalized content experiences, and even gaming.
Netflix’s success wasn’t in getting any one bet right. It was in balancing the bets and learning faster than the market. Its Innovation portfolio matured with the market, while its strategic funding followed signal over instinct.
FAQs
Why do so many organizations over-index on Core Innovations?
Because they’re easy to justify, simple to measure, and quick to execute. Core feels “safe,” which is often code for “politically defensible.”
How can we avoid over-funding or under-funding one Innovation category?
Use a structured resource allocation approach — typically 70–20–10 for Core, Adjacent, and Transformational respectively — and revisit it quarterly based on initiative performance.
What are the hidden risks of Adjacent Innovation?
Cultural misalignment, channel confusion, or brand dilution. Just because a move is “adjacent” doesn’t mean it’s natural.
How do we justify long-term investment in Transformational Innovation?
By framing it as strategic risk mitigation and future revenue insurance. If your board needs proof, show them what happened to Blockbuster, Kodak, or Nokia.
Conclusion
This framework doesn’t give equal weight to all ideas. That’s the point. Innovation isn’t a crowdsourced utopia. It’s a portfolio management discipline rooted in strategic intent, informed bets, and ruthless pruning.
The smartest organizations treat Innovation not as a feel-good mantra but as a structured portfolio that evolves with the market. They balance the immediate with the inevitable. They place bets that are bold, not blind. And when they miss, they learn fast and pivot faster.
The real power of the Innovation-Ambition Matrix? It gives permission to stop chasing shiny objects — and start shaping the future with conviction, clarity, and capital.
Interested in learning more about the categories of Innovation in detail? You can download an editable PowerPoint presentation on Innovation-Ambition Matrix here on the Flevy documents marketplace.
Do You Find Value in This Framework?
You can download in-depth presentations on this and hundreds of similar business frameworks from the FlevyPro Library. FlevyPro is trusted and utilized by 1000s of management consultants and corporate executives.
For even more best practices available on Flevy, have a look at our top 100 lists:
